Connection is module structure over connection algebra: Difference between revisions
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
First observe that the map sends <math>C^\infty(M) \subset \mathcal{D}^1(M)</math> to <math>C^\infty(M) \subset B</math>, and is the identity restricted to that subset. In other words, the differential operator of multiplication by a function <math>f</math>, goes to the operator of multiplication by the function <math>f</math>. | First observe that the map sends <math>C^\infty(M) \subset \mathcal{D}^1(M)</math> to <math>C^\infty(M) \subset B</math>, and is the identity restricted to that subset. In other words, the differential operator of multiplication by a function <math>f</math>, goes to the operator of multiplication by the function <math>f</math>. | ||
We now prove | We now prove that the map <math>\nabla \mapsto f_\nabla</math> is a <math>C^\infty(M)</math>-bimodule map from <math>D^1(M)</math> to <math>B</math>, i.e., left and right multiplication by <math>m(g)</math> can be ''pulled out'' of the <math>f_\nabla</math>: | ||
* <math>f_\nabla</math> is <math>\R</math>-bilinear: This is obvious. | * <math>f_\nabla</math> is <math>\R</math>-bilinear: This is obvious. | ||
* For any element <math>X + m(g)</math> in <math>\mathcal{D}^1(M)</math> and any <math>h \in C^\infty(M)</math>, we have <math>f_\nabla(m(g) \ | * Left module map property: For any element <math>X + m(g)</math> in <math>\mathcal{D}^1(M)</math> and any <math>h \in C^\infty(M)</math>, we have <math>f_\nabla(m(g) \cdot (X + m(h))(s) = (m(g) \circ f_\nabla(X + m(h)))(s)</math>. This essentially follows from the fact that a connection is [[tensorial map|tensorial]] in the direction of differentiation: | ||
<math>f_\nabla(m(g) \ | <math>f_\nabla(m(g) \cdot (X + m(h)))(s) = f_\nabla(gX + m(gh))(s) = \nabla_{gX}(s) + (gh)(s)= g\nabla_X(s) + (gh)(s) = g(\nabla_X(s) + hs) = m(g)f_\nabla(X + m(h))(s)</math>. | ||
* For any element <math>X + m(g)</math> in <math>\mathcal{D}^1(M)</math> and any <math>h \in C^\infty(M)</math>, we have <math>f_\nabla((X + m(h)) \ | * For any element <math>X + m(g)</math> in <math>\mathcal{D}^1(M)</math> and any <math>h \in C^\infty(M)</math>, we have <math>(f_\nabla((X + m(h)) \cdot m(g))(s) = (f_\nabla(X + m(h)) \circ m(g))(s)</math>. This essentially follows from the Leibniz rule property. | ||
<math>f_\nabla((X + m(h)) \ | <math>f_\nabla((X + m(h)) \cdot m(g))(s) = f_\nabla(m(Xg) +g\nabla_X + m(gh))(s) = (Xg)(s) + g\nabla_X(s) + (gh)s = \nabla_X(gs) + (gh)(s) = (f_\nabla(X + m(h)) \cdot m(g))(s)</math>. | ||
Since <math>\nabla \mapsto f_\nabla</math> is a <math>C^\infty</math>-bimodule map, it extends to a unique <math>C^\infty</math>-bimodule map from the <math>C^\infty</math>-tensor algebra over <math>\mathcal{D}^1(M)</math>. By definition, the element <math>m(1) - 1</math> induces the zero map on <math>\Gamma(E)</math>, so the map descends to a homomorphism <math>\mathcal{C}(M) \to B</math>, as desired. | |||
===From a module structure to a connection=== | |||
'''Given''': A manifold <math>M</math>, a vector bundle <math>E</math> over <math>M</math>. <math>B</math> is the algebra of smooth fiber-preserving maps from <math>\Gamma(E)</math> to <math>\Gamma(E)</math>. <math>\mathcal{D}^1(M)</math> is the Lie algebra of first-order differential operators on <math>M</math> and <math>\mathcal{C}(M)</math> is the connection algebra on <math>M</math>. A module structure of <math>\Gamma(E)</math> over <math>\mathcal{C}(M)</math>. | |||
==References== | ==References== |
Latest revision as of 00:42, 24 July 2009
Statement
Let be a vector bundle over a differential manifold . Then, a connection on is equivalent to giving (the vector space of sections of ) the structure of a module over the connection algebra of . Equivalently, it gives (the sheaf of sections of ) the structure of a module over the sheaf of connection algebras over .
Definitions used
Connection
Further information: Connection
Connection algebra
Further information: Connection algebra
Proof
From a connection to a module structure
The outline of the proof is as follows:
- We first show that a connection gives an action of the first-order differentiable operators on the space of sections.
- Next, we show that the Leibniz rule property of connections allows us to extend this to a well-defined action of the connection algebra.
Given: A manifold , a vector bundle over , a connection on . is the algebra of smooth fiber-preserving maps from to . is the Lie algebra of first-order differential operators on and is the connection algebra on .
To prove: gives rise to a homomorphism from to .
Proof: gives rise to a map:
as follows:
.
First observe that the map sends to , and is the identity restricted to that subset. In other words, the differential operator of multiplication by a function , goes to the operator of multiplication by the function .
We now prove that the map is a -bimodule map from to , i.e., left and right multiplication by can be pulled out of the :
- is -bilinear: This is obvious.
- Left module map property: For any element in and any , we have . This essentially follows from the fact that a connection is tensorial in the direction of differentiation:
.
- For any element in and any , we have . This essentially follows from the Leibniz rule property.
.
Since is a -bimodule map, it extends to a unique -bimodule map from the -tensor algebra over . By definition, the element induces the zero map on , so the map descends to a homomorphism , as desired.
From a module structure to a connection
Given: A manifold , a vector bundle over . is the algebra of smooth fiber-preserving maps from to . is the Lie algebra of first-order differential operators on and is the connection algebra on . A module structure of over .
References
Textbook references
- Book:GlobalcalculusMore info, Page 64