Curvature is tensorial: Difference between revisions

From Diffgeom
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 23: Line 23:
| 2 || The Leibniz-like axiom that is part of the definition of a connection || For a function <math>f</math> and vector fields <math>A,B</math>, and a connection <math>\nabla</math>, we have <math>\nabla_A(fB) = (Af)(B) + f\nabla_A(B)</math>
| 2 || The Leibniz-like axiom that is part of the definition of a connection || For a function <math>f</math> and vector fields <math>A,B</math>, and a connection <math>\nabla</math>, we have <math>\nabla_A(fB) = (Af)(B) + f\nabla_A(B)</math>
|-
|-
| 3 || [[uses::Corollary of Leibniz rule for Lie bracket]] (in turn follows from [[uses::leibniz rule for derivations]]|| For a function <math>f</math> and vector fields <math>X,Y</math>:
| 3 || [[uses::Corollary of Leibniz rule for Lie bracket]] (in turn follows from [[uses::Leibniz rule for derivations]]|| For a function <math>f</math> and vector fields <math>X,Y</math>:
<br><math>\! f[X,Y] = [fX,Y] + (Yf)X</math><br><math>f[X,Y] = [X,fY] - (Xf)Y</math>
<br><math>\! f[X,Y] = [fX,Y] + (Yf)X</math><br><math>\! f[X,Y] = [X,fY] - (Xf)Y</math>
|}
|}


Line 56: Line 56:
| 4 || <math>f(\nabla_X\nabla_Y - \nabla_Y\nabla_X) - \nabla_{(Yf)X + [fX,Y]}</math> || <math>\nabla</math> is additive in its subscript argument || <math>\nabla_{(Yf)X} + \nabla_{[fX,Y]} = \nabla_{(Yf)X + [fX,Y]}</math>
| 4 || <math>f(\nabla_X\nabla_Y - \nabla_Y\nabla_X) - \nabla_{(Yf)X + [fX,Y]}</math> || <math>\nabla</math> is additive in its subscript argument || <math>\nabla_{(Yf)X} + \nabla_{[fX,Y]} = \nabla_{(Yf)X + [fX,Y]}</math>
|-
|-
| 5 || <math>f(\nabla_X\nabla_Y - \nabla_Y\nabla_X - \nabla_{[X,Y]})</math> || Fact (3) || <math>[fX,Y] + (Yf)X \to f[X,Y]</math>.
| 5 || <math>f(\nabla_X\nabla_Y - \nabla_Y\nabla_X) - \nabla_{f[X,Y]}</math> || Fact (3) || <math>[fX,Y] + (Yf)X \to f[X,Y]</math>
|-
| 6 || <math>f(\nabla_X\nabla_Y - \nabla_Y\nabla_X - \nabla_{[X,Y]})</math> || Fact (1) || <math>\nabla_{f[X,Y]} \to f\nabla_{[X,Y]}</math>
|}
|}


Line 82: Line 84:
| 4 || <math>f(\nabla_X\nabla_Y - \nabla_Y\nabla_X) - \nabla_{[X,fY] - (Xf)Y}</math> || <math>\nabla</math> is additive in its subscript argument. || <math>\nabla_{[X,fY]} - \nabla_{(Xf)Y} \to \nabla_{[X,fY] - (Xf)Y}</math>.
| 4 || <math>f(\nabla_X\nabla_Y - \nabla_Y\nabla_X) - \nabla_{[X,fY] - (Xf)Y}</math> || <math>\nabla</math> is additive in its subscript argument. || <math>\nabla_{[X,fY]} - \nabla_{(Xf)Y} \to \nabla_{[X,fY] - (Xf)Y}</math>.
|-
|-
| 5 || <math>f(\nabla_X\nabla_Y - \nabla_Y\nabla_X - \nabla_{[X,Y]}</math> || Fact (3) || <math>[X,fY] - (Xf)Y \to f[X,Y]</math>
| 5 || <math>f(\nabla_X\nabla_Y - \nabla_Y\nabla_X) - \nabla_{f[X,Y]}</math> || Fact (3) || <math>[X,fY] - (Xf)Y \to f[X,Y]</math>
|-
| 6 || <math>f(\nabla_X\nabla_Y - \nabla_Y\nabla_X - \nabla_{[X,Y]})</math> || Fact (1) || <math>\nabla_{f[X,Y]} \to f\nabla_{[X,Y]}</math>
|}
|}



Latest revision as of 17:36, 6 January 2012

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, that a map constructed in a certain way is tensorial
View other such statements

Statement

Let ∇ be a connection on a vector bundle E over a differential manifold M. The Riemann curvature tensor of ∇ is given as a map Γ(TM)⊗Γ(TM)⊗Γ(E)→Γ(E) defined by:

R(X,Y)Z=∇X∇YZ−∇Y∇XZ−∇[X,Y]Z

We claim that R is a tensorial map in each of the variables X,Y,Z.

Related facts

Facts used

Fact no. Name Statement with symbols
1 Any connection is C∞-linear in its subscript argument ∇fA=f∇A for any C∞-function f and vector field A.
2 The Leibniz-like axiom that is part of the definition of a connection For a function f and vector fields A,B, and a connection ∇, we have ∇A(fB)=(Af)(B)+f∇A(B)
3 Corollary of Leibniz rule for Lie bracket (in turn follows from Leibniz rule for derivations For a function f and vector fields X,Y:


f[X,Y]=[fX,Y]+(Yf)X
f[X,Y]=[X,fY]−(Xf)Y

Proof

To prove tensoriality in a variable, it suffices to show C∞-linearity in that variable. This is because linearity in C∞-functions guarantees linearity in a function that is 1 at exactly one point, and zero at others.

The proofs for X and Y are analogous, and rely on manipulation of the Lie bracket [fX,Y] and the property of a connection being C∞ in the subscript vector. These proofs do not involve any explicit use of Z. The proof for Z relies simply on repeated application of the product rule, and the fact that XY−YX=[X,Y].

Tensoriality in the first variable

Given: f:M→R is a C∞-function.

To prove: R(fX,Y)=fR(X,Y), or more explicitly, ∇fX∇Y−∇Y∇fX−∇[fX,Y]=f(∇X∇Y−∇Y∇X−∇[X,Y]

We start out with the left side:

∇fX∇Y−∇Y∇fX−∇[fX,Y]

Each step below is obtained from the previous one via some manipulation explained along side.

Step no. Current status of left side Facts/properties used Specific rewrites
1 f∇X∇Y−∇Y(f∇X)−∇[fX,Y] Fact (1): ∇ is C∞-linear in its subscript argument. ∇fX→f∇X
2 f∇X∇Y−(Yf)∇X−f∇Y∇X−∇[fX,Y] Fact (2) ∇Y(f∇X)→(Yf)∇X+f∇Y∇X. To understand this more clearly imagine an input Z to the whole expression, so that the rewrite becomes ∇Y(f∇X(Z))→(Yf)∇X(Z)+f∇Y∇X(Z). In the notation of fact (3), A=Y, f=f, and B=∇X(Z).
3 f(∇X∇Y−∇Y∇X)−∇(Yf)X−∇[fX,Y] Fact (1) (Yf)∇X→∇(Yf)X
4 f(∇X∇Y−∇Y∇X)−∇(Yf)X+[fX,Y] ∇ is additive in its subscript argument ∇(Yf)X+∇[fX,Y]=∇(Yf)X+[fX,Y]
5 f(∇X∇Y−∇Y∇X)−∇f[X,Y] Fact (3) [fX,Y]+(Yf)X→f[X,Y]
6 f(∇X∇Y−∇Y∇X−∇[X,Y]) Fact (1) ∇f[X,Y]→f∇[X,Y]

Tensoriality in the second variable

Given: f:M→R is a C∞-function.

To prove: R(X,fY)=fR(X,Y), or more explicitly, ∇X∇fY−∇fY∇X−∇[X,fY]=f(∇X∇Y−∇Y∇X−∇[X,Y].

We start out with the left side:

∇X∇fY−∇fY∇X−∇[X,fY]

Each step below is obtained from the previous one via some manipulation explained along side.

Step no. Current status of left side Facts/properties used Specific rewrites
1 ∇X(f∇Y)−f∇Y∇X−∇[X,fY] Fact (1) ∇fY→f∇Y.
2 (Xf)∇Y+f(∇X∇Y)−f∇Y∇X−∇[X,fY] Fact (2) ∇X(f∇Y)→(Xf)∇Y+f(∇X∇Y). To make this more concrete, imagine an input Z. Then, the rewrite becomes ∇X(f∇Y(Z))→(Xf)∇Y(X)+f(∇X∇Y(Z)). This comes setting A=X, f=f, B=∇YZ in Fact (3).
3 f(∇X∇Y−∇Y∇X)−∇[X,fY]+∇(Xf)Y Fact (1) (Xf)∇Y→∇(Xf)Y
4 f(∇X∇Y−∇Y∇X)−∇[X,fY]−(Xf)Y ∇ is additive in its subscript argument. ∇[X,fY]−∇(Xf)Y→∇[X,fY]−(Xf)Y.
5 f(∇X∇Y−∇Y∇X)−∇f[X,Y] Fact (3) [X,fY]−(Xf)Y→f[X,Y]
6 f(∇X∇Y−∇Y∇X−∇[X,Y]) Fact (1) ∇f[X,Y]→f∇[X,Y]

Tensoriality in the third variable

Given: A C∞-function f:M→R.

To prove: R(X,Y)(fZ)=fR(X,Y)Z. More explicitly, ∇X∇Y(fZ)−∇Y∇X(fZ)−∇[X,Y](fZ)=f(∇X∇Y−∇Y∇X−∇[X,Y])Z+((XY−YX−[X,Y])f)Z.

We start out with the left side:

∇X∇Y(fZ)−∇Y∇X(fZ)−∇[X,Y](fZ)

Each step below is obtained from the previous one via some manipulation explained along side.

Step no. Current status of left side Facts/properties used Specific rewrites
1 ∇X((Yf)(Z)+f∇YZ)−∇Y((Xf)Z+f∇XZ)−f∇[X,Y]Z−([X,Y]f)Z Fact (2) ∇Y(fZ)→(Yf)(Z)+f∇YZ and ∇X(fZ)→(Xf)Z+f∇XZ
2 (XYf)(Z)+(Yf)∇XZ+(Xf)∇YZ+f∇X∇YZ−(YXf)Z−(Xf)∇YZ−(Yf)∇XZ−f∇Y∇XZ−f∇[X,Y]Z−([X,Y]f)Z Fact (2) ∇X((Yf)Z)→X((Yf)Z)+(Yf)∇XZ, etc.
3 f(∇X∇Y−∇Y∇X−∇[X,Y])Z+((XY−YX−[X,Y])f)Z -- cancellations
4 f(∇X∇Y−∇Y∇X−∇[X,Y])Z+((XY−YX−[X,Y])f)Z use [X,Y]=XY−YX, definition cancellation