Curvature of a connection: Difference between revisions

From Diffgeom
No edit summary
 
 
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{quotation|''This curvature is also sometimes known as the '''Riemann curvature tensor'''. However, the latter term is usually reserved for situations where we have a [[linear connection]], in particular, the [[Riemann curvature tensor of Levi-Civita connection|Riemann curvature tensor arising]] from the [[Levi-Civita connection]] for a [[Riemannian manifold|Riemannian]] or [[pseudo-Riemannian manifold]]''}}
==Definition==
==Definition==


Line 11: Line 12:
The '''curvature''' of <math>\nabla</math> is defined as the map:
The '''curvature''' of <math>\nabla</math> is defined as the map:


<math>R(X,Y) = \nabla_X \circ \nabla_Y - \nabla_Y \circ \nabla_X - \nabla_{{X,Y]}</math>
<math>R(X,Y) = \nabla_X \circ \nabla_Y - \nabla_Y \circ \nabla_X - \nabla_{[X,Y]}</math>


where <math>X, Y \in \Gamma
where <math>X, Y \in \Gamma</math>


Note that <math>R(X,Y)</math> itself outputs a linear map <math>\Gamma(E) \to \Gamma(E)</math>. We can thus write this as:
Note that <math>R(X,Y)</math> itself outputs a linear map <math>\Gamma(E) \to \Gamma(E)</math>. We can thus write this as:


<math>R(X,Y)Z = \nabla_X (\nabla_Y Z) - \nabla_Y (\nabla_X Z) - \nabla_{[X,Y]}Z</math>
<math>R(X,Y)Z = \nabla_X (\nabla_Y Z) - \nabla_Y (\nabla_X Z) - \nabla_{[X,Y]}Z</math>
===In local coordinates===
{{further|[[curvature matrix of a connection]]}}
Consider a system of local coordinate charts for <math>M</math> such that the vector bundle <math>E</math> is trivial on each chart. For any connection <math>\nabla</math>, we can write a matrix that, in local coordinates, describes the curvature of <math>\nabla</math>. This matrix is sometimes denoted as <math>\Omega</math>, and is defined by:
<math>\Omega := d\omega + \omega \wedge \omega</math>
Here, <math>\omega</math> is a [[matrix of connection forms]].


===In the linear case===
===In the linear case===


In the special case where <math>E = TM</math>, we have that <math>X,Y, Z \in \Gamma(TM)</math>. We can thus think of this map as a (1,3)-tensor because it takes as input three vector fields and outputs one vector field.
In the special case where <math>E = TM</math> (the case of a [[linear connection]]) we get that <math>X,Y, Z \in \Gamma(TM)</math>. We can thus think of this map as a (1,3)-tensor because it takes as input three vector fields and outputs one vector field.
 
==Properties==
 
===Tensoriality===
 
{{further|[[Curvature is tensorial]]}}
 
The curvature is tensorial in ''all'' three arguments. This is best proved by proving <math>C^\infty</math>-linearity in all arguments, via a computation.
 
===Antisymmetry===
 
{{further|[[Curvature is antisymmetric in first two variables]]}}
 
We have the following identity:


This is the famed [[Riemann curvature tensor]] that is important for its algebraic and differential properties.
<math>R(X,Y) = -R(Y,X)</math>

Latest revision as of 12:24, 22 May 2008

This curvature is also sometimes known as the Riemann curvature tensor. However, the latter term is usually reserved for situations where we have a linear connection, in particular, the Riemann curvature tensor arising from the Levi-Civita connection for a Riemannian or pseudo-Riemannian manifold

Definition

Given data

Definition part

The curvature of is defined as the map:

where

Note that itself outputs a linear map . We can thus write this as:

In local coordinates

Further information: curvature matrix of a connection

Consider a system of local coordinate charts for such that the vector bundle is trivial on each chart. For any connection , we can write a matrix that, in local coordinates, describes the curvature of . This matrix is sometimes denoted as , and is defined by:

Here, is a matrix of connection forms.

In the linear case

In the special case where (the case of a linear connection) we get that . We can thus think of this map as a (1,3)-tensor because it takes as input three vector fields and outputs one vector field.

Properties

Tensoriality

Further information: Curvature is tensorial

The curvature is tensorial in all three arguments. This is best proved by proving -linearity in all arguments, via a computation.

Antisymmetry

Further information: Curvature is antisymmetric in first two variables

We have the following identity: