Curvature of a connection: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(11 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{quotation|''This curvature is also sometimes known as the '''Riemann curvature tensor'''. However, the latter term is usually reserved for situations where we have a [[linear connection]], in particular, the [[Riemann curvature tensor of Levi-Civita connection|Riemann curvature tensor arising]] from the [[Levi-Civita connection]] for a [[Riemannian manifold|Riemannian]] or [[pseudo-Riemannian manifold]]''}} | |||
==Definition== | ==Definition== | ||
Line 11: | Line 12: | ||
The '''curvature''' of <math>\nabla</math> is defined as the map: | The '''curvature''' of <math>\nabla</math> is defined as the map: | ||
<math>R(X,Y) = \nabla_X \circ \nabla_Y - \nabla_Y \circ \nabla_X - \nabla_{ | <math>R(X,Y) = \nabla_X \circ \nabla_Y - \nabla_Y \circ \nabla_X - \nabla_{[X,Y]}</math> | ||
where <math>X, Y \in \Gamma | where <math>X, Y \in \Gamma</math> | ||
Note that <math>R(X,Y)</math> itself outputs a linear map <math>\Gamma(E) \to \Gamma(E)</math>. We can thus write this as: | Note that <math>R(X,Y)</math> itself outputs a linear map <math>\Gamma(E) \to \Gamma(E)</math>. We can thus write this as: | ||
<math>R(X,Y)Z = \nabla_X (\nabla_Y Z) - \nabla_Y (\nabla_X Z) - \nabla_{[X,Y]}Z</math> | <math>R(X,Y)Z = \nabla_X (\nabla_Y Z) - \nabla_Y (\nabla_X Z) - \nabla_{[X,Y]}Z</math> | ||
===In local coordinates=== | |||
{{further|[[curvature matrix of a connection]]}} | |||
Consider a system of local coordinate charts for <math>M</math> such that the vector bundle <math>E</math> is trivial on each chart. For any connection <math>\nabla</math>, we can write a matrix that, in local coordinates, describes the curvature of <math>\nabla</math>. This matrix is sometimes denoted as <math>\Omega</math>, and is defined by: | |||
<math>\Omega := d\omega + \omega \wedge \omega</math> | |||
Here, <math>\omega</math> is a [[matrix of connection forms]]. | |||
===In the linear case=== | ===In the linear case=== | ||
In the special case where <math>E = TM</math> | In the special case where <math>E = TM</math> (the case of a [[linear connection]]) we get that <math>X,Y, Z \in \Gamma(TM)</math>. We can thus think of this map as a (1,3)-tensor because it takes as input three vector fields and outputs one vector field. | ||
==Properties== | |||
===Tensoriality=== | |||
{{further|[[Curvature is tensorial]]}} | |||
The curvature is tensorial in ''all'' three arguments. This is best proved by proving <math>C^\infty</math>-linearity in all arguments, via a computation. | |||
===Antisymmetry=== | |||
{{further|[[Curvature is antisymmetric in first two variables]]}} | |||
We have the following identity: | |||
<math>R(X,Y) = -R(Y,X)</math> |
Latest revision as of 12:24, 22 May 2008
This curvature is also sometimes known as the Riemann curvature tensor. However, the latter term is usually reserved for situations where we have a linear connection, in particular, the Riemann curvature tensor arising from the Levi-Civita connection for a Riemannian or pseudo-Riemannian manifold
Definition
Given data
- A connected differential manifold
- A vector bundle over
- A connection for
Definition part
The curvature of is defined as the map:
where
Note that itself outputs a linear map . We can thus write this as:
In local coordinates
Further information: curvature matrix of a connection
Consider a system of local coordinate charts for such that the vector bundle is trivial on each chart. For any connection , we can write a matrix that, in local coordinates, describes the curvature of . This matrix is sometimes denoted as , and is defined by:
Here, is a matrix of connection forms.
In the linear case
In the special case where (the case of a linear connection) we get that . We can thus think of this map as a (1,3)-tensor because it takes as input three vector fields and outputs one vector field.
Properties
Tensoriality
Further information: Curvature is tensorial
The curvature is tensorial in all three arguments. This is best proved by proving -linearity in all arguments, via a computation.
Antisymmetry
Further information: Curvature is antisymmetric in first two variables
We have the following identity: