Torsion is tensorial: Difference between revisions
(→Proof) |
|||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
''Proof'': We prove this by expanding everything out on the left side: | ''Proof'': We prove this by expanding everything out on the left side: | ||
<math>\tau(nabla)(X,fY) = \nabla_X(fY) = \nabla_{fY}(X) - [X,fY] = (Xf)(Y) + f \nabla_XY - f\nabla_YX - f[X,Y] - (Xf)Y</math> | <math>\tau(\nabla)(X,fY) = \nabla_X(fY) = \nabla_{fY}(X) - [X,fY] = (Xf)(Y) + f \nabla_XY - f\nabla_YX - f[X,Y] - (Xf)Y</math> | ||
(the last step uses the corollary of Leibniz rule). | (the last step uses the corollary of Leibniz rule). | ||
Canceling terms, yields the required result. | Canceling terms, yields the required result. | ||
Revision as of 14:34, 10 April 2008
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, that a map constructed in a certain way is tensorial
View other such statements
Statement
Symbolic statement
Let be a differential manifold and be a linear connection on (viz., is a connection on the tangent bundle of ).
Consider the torsion of , namely:
given by:
Then, is a tensorial map in both coordinates.
Facts used
- Leibniz rule for derivations: This states that for a vector field and functions , we have:
- Corollary of Leibniz rule for Lie bracket: This states that for a function and vector fields :
- The Leibniz rule axiom that's part of the definition of a connection, namely:
Proof
Tensoriality in the first coordinate
We'll use the fact that tensoriality is equivalent to -linearity.
To prove:
Proof: We prove this by expanding everything out on the left side:
To prove the equality with , we observe that it reduces to showing:
which is exactly what the corollary of Leibniz rule above states.
Tensoriality in the second coordinate
The proof is analogous to that for the first coordinate.
To prove
Proof: We prove this by expanding everything out on the left side:
(the last step uses the corollary of Leibniz rule).
Canceling terms, yields the required result.