Curvature is tensorial: Difference between revisions
(→Proof) |
|||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
<math>f(\nabla_X\nabla_Y - \nabla_Y\nabla_X) - \nabla_{(Yf)X + [fX,Y]}</math> | <math>f(\nabla_X\nabla_Y - \nabla_Y\nabla_X) - \nabla_{(Yf)X + [fX,Y]}</math> | ||
Now it remains to simplify <math>(Yf)X + [fX,Y]</math>. Observe that: | Now it remains to simplify <math>(Yf)X + [fX,Y]</math>. Observe that for any scalar function <math>h</math>: | ||
<math>[fX,Y](h) = (fX)(Yh) - Y((fX)h) = (fX)(Yh) - (Yf)(Xh) - (fY(Xh) = f([X,Y]h) - (Yf)(Xh)</math> | <math>[fX,Y](h) = (fX)(Yh) - Y((fX)h) = (fX)(Yh) - (Yf)(Xh) - (fY(Xh) = f([X,Y]h) - (Yf)(Xh)</math> | ||
Revision as of 12:08, 30 August 2007
Statement
Let be a connection on a vector bundle over a differential manifold . The Riemann curvature tensor of is given as a map defined by:
We claim that is indeed a tensor, viz it is tensorial in each of .
Proof
To prove tensoriality in a variable, it suffices to show -linearity in that variable. This is because linearity in -functions guarantees linearity in a function that is 1 at exactly one point, and zero at others.
The proofs for and are analogous, and rely on manipulation of the Lie bracket and the property of a connection being in the subscript vector. These proofs do not involve any explicit use of . The proof for relies simply on repeated application of the product rule, and the fact that .
Tensoriality in the first variable
Let be a scalar function. We will show that:
We start out with the left side:
Now by the definition of a connection, is -linear in its subscript argument. Thus, the above expression can be written as:
Now applying the Leibniz rule for connections, we get:
We can rewrite and we then get:
Now it remains to simplify . Observe that for any scalar function :
This tells us that:
which, substituted back, gives:
Tensoriality in the second variable
Let be a scalar function. We will show that:
We start out with the left side:
Applying the Leibniz rule and the property of a connection being in its subscript variable yields:
which simplifies to:
We now use the fact that:
which tells us that:
substituting this gives:
which is
Tensoriality in the third variable
Let be a scalar function. We will show that:
We start out with the left side:
Now we apply the Leibniz rule for connnections on each term:
We again apply the Leibniz rule to the first two term groups:
After cancellations we are left with the following six terms:
But since , the last three terms vanish, and we are left with: