Torsion is tensorial: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
==Facts used== | ==Facts used== | ||
* [[Leibniz rule for derivations]]: This states that for a vector field <math>X</math> and functions <math>f,g</math>, we have: | |||
<math>X(fg) = (Xf)(g) + f(Xg)</math> | |||
* [[Corollary of Leibniz rule for Lie bracket]]: This | |||
* [[Corollary of Leibniz rule for Lie bracket]]: This states that for a function <math>f</math> and vector fields <math>X,Y</math>: | |||
<math>f[X,Y] = [fX,Y] + (Yf)X</math> | |||
<math>f[X,Y] = (Xf)Y - [X,fY]</math> | |||
* The Leibniz rule axiom that's part of the definition of a [[connection]], namely: | |||
<math>\nabla_X(fZ) = (Xf)(Z) + f\nabla_X(Z)</math> | |||
==Proof== | ==Proof== |
Revision as of 01:13, 5 April 2008
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, that a map constructed in a certain way is tensorial
View other such statements
Statement
Symbolic statement
Let be a differential manifold and be a linear connection on (viz., is a connection on the tangent bundle of ).
Consider the torsion of , namely:
given by:
Then, is a tensorial map in both coordinates.
Facts used
- Leibniz rule for derivations: This states that for a vector field and functions , we have:
- Corollary of Leibniz rule for Lie bracket: This states that for a function and vector fields :
- The Leibniz rule axiom that's part of the definition of a connection, namely:
Proof
Tensoriality in the first coordinate
We'll use the fact that tensoriality is equivalent to -linearity.
To prove:
Proof: We prove this by expanding everything out:
To prove the equality with , we observe that it reduces to showing:
which is exactly what the corollary of Leibniz rule above states.
Tensoriality in the second coordinate
The proof is analogous to that for the first coordinate.
Fill this in later