Torsion is tensorial: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
''Proof'': We prove this by expanding everything out: | ''Proof'': We prove this by expanding everything out: | ||
<math>\tau(\nabla)(fX,Y) = | <math>\tau(\nabla)(fX,Y) = \nabla_{fX}(Y) - \nabla_Y(fX) - [fX,Y] = f \nabla_X Y - f \nabla_Y X - (Yf)(X) - [fX,Y]</math> | ||
To prove the equality with <math>f \tau(\nabla)(X,Y)</math>, we observe that it reduces to showing: | To prove the equality with <math>f \tau(\nabla)(X,Y)</math>, we observe that it reduces to showing: | ||
Revision as of 22:59, 5 April 2008
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, that a map constructed in a certain way is tensorial
View other such statements
Statement
Symbolic statement
Let be a differential manifold and be a linear connection on (viz., is a connection on the tangent bundle of ).
Consider the torsion of , namely:
given by:
Then, is a tensorial map in both coordinates.
Facts used
- Leibniz rule for derivations: This states that for a vector field and functions , we have:
- Corollary of Leibniz rule for Lie bracket: This states that for a function and vector fields :
- The Leibniz rule axiom that's part of the definition of a connection, namely:
Proof
Tensoriality in the first coordinate
We'll use the fact that tensoriality is equivalent to -linearity.
To prove:
Proof: We prove this by expanding everything out:
To prove the equality with , we observe that it reduces to showing:
which is exactly what the corollary of Leibniz rule above states.
Tensoriality in the second coordinate
The proof is analogous to that for the first coordinate.
Fill this in later