Torsion is tensorial: Difference between revisions
(→Proof) |
|||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
''To prove'': <math>\tau(\nabla)(fX,Y) = f\tau(\nabla)(X,Y)</math> | ''To prove'': <math>\tau(\nabla)(fX,Y) = f\tau(\nabla)(X,Y)</math> | ||
''Proof'': We prove this by expanding everything out: | ''Proof'': We prove this by expanding everything out on the left side: | ||
<math>\tau(\nabla)(fX,Y) = \nabla_{fX}(Y) - \nabla_Y(fX) - [fX,Y] = f \nabla_X Y - f \nabla_Y X - (Yf)(X) - [fX,Y]</math> | <math>\tau(\nabla)(fX,Y) = \nabla_{fX}(Y) - \nabla_Y(fX) - [fX,Y] = f \nabla_X Y - f \nabla_Y X - (Yf)(X) - [fX,Y]</math> | ||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
The proof is analogous to that for the first coordinate. | The proof is analogous to that for the first coordinate. | ||
{ | ''To prove'' <math>\tau(\nabla)(X,fY) = f \tau(\nabla)(X,Y)</math> | ||
''Proof'': We prove this by expanding everything out on the left side: | |||
<math>\tau(nabla)(X,fY) = \nabla_X(fY) = \nabla_{fY}(X) - [X,fY] = (Xf)(Y) + f \nabla_XY - f\nabla_YX - f[X,Y] - (Xf)Y</math> | |||
(the last step uses the corollary of Leibniz rule). | |||
Canceling terms, yields the required result. | |||
Revision as of 14:33, 10 April 2008
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, that a map constructed in a certain way is tensorial
View other such statements
Statement
Symbolic statement
Let be a differential manifold and be a linear connection on (viz., is a connection on the tangent bundle of ).
Consider the torsion of , namely:
given by:
Then, is a tensorial map in both coordinates.
Facts used
- Leibniz rule for derivations: This states that for a vector field and functions , we have:
- Corollary of Leibniz rule for Lie bracket: This states that for a function and vector fields :
- The Leibniz rule axiom that's part of the definition of a connection, namely:
Proof
Tensoriality in the first coordinate
We'll use the fact that tensoriality is equivalent to -linearity.
To prove:
Proof: We prove this by expanding everything out on the left side:
To prove the equality with , we observe that it reduces to showing:
which is exactly what the corollary of Leibniz rule above states.
Tensoriality in the second coordinate
The proof is analogous to that for the first coordinate.
To prove
Proof: We prove this by expanding everything out on the left side:
(the last step uses the corollary of Leibniz rule).
Canceling terms, yields the required result.