Torsion is tensorial: Difference between revisions

From Diffgeom
Line 39: Line 39:
''To prove'': <math>\tau(\nabla)(fX,Y) = f\tau(\nabla)(X,Y)</math>
''To prove'': <math>\tau(\nabla)(fX,Y) = f\tau(\nabla)(X,Y)</math>


''Proof'': We prove this by expanding everything out:
''Proof'': We prove this by expanding everything out on the left side:


<math>\tau(\nabla)(fX,Y) = \nabla_{fX}(Y) - \nabla_Y(fX) - [fX,Y] = f \nabla_X Y  - f \nabla_Y X - (Yf)(X) - [fX,Y]</math>
<math>\tau(\nabla)(fX,Y) = \nabla_{fX}(Y) - \nabla_Y(fX) - [fX,Y] = f \nabla_X Y  - f \nabla_Y X - (Yf)(X) - [fX,Y]</math>
Line 53: Line 53:
The proof is analogous to that for the first coordinate.
The proof is analogous to that for the first coordinate.


{{fillin}}
''To prove'' <math>\tau(\nabla)(X,fY) = f \tau(\nabla)(X,Y)</math>
 
''Proof'': We prove this by expanding everything out on the left side:
 
<math>\tau(nabla)(X,fY) = \nabla_X(fY) = \nabla_{fY}(X) - [X,fY] = (Xf)(Y) + f \nabla_XY - f\nabla_YX - f[X,Y] - (Xf)Y</math>
 
(the last step uses the corollary of Leibniz rule).
 
Canceling terms, yields the required result.

Revision as of 14:33, 10 April 2008

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, that a map constructed in a certain way is tensorial
View other such statements

Statement

Symbolic statement

Let be a differential manifold and be a linear connection on (viz., is a connection on the tangent bundle of ).

Consider the torsion of , namely:

given by:

Then, is a tensorial map in both coordinates.

Facts used

  • The Leibniz rule axiom that's part of the definition of a connection, namely:

Proof

Tensoriality in the first coordinate

We'll use the fact that tensoriality is equivalent to -linearity.

To prove:

Proof: We prove this by expanding everything out on the left side:

To prove the equality with , we observe that it reduces to showing:

which is exactly what the corollary of Leibniz rule above states.

Tensoriality in the second coordinate

The proof is analogous to that for the first coordinate.

To prove

Proof: We prove this by expanding everything out on the left side:

(the last step uses the corollary of Leibniz rule).

Canceling terms, yields the required result.