Torsion is tensorial: Difference between revisions

From Diffgeom
Line 45: Line 45:
To prove the equality with <math>f \tau(\nabla)(X,Y)</math>, we observe that it reduces to showing:
To prove the equality with <math>f \tau(\nabla)(X,Y)</math>, we observe that it reduces to showing:


<math>(Yf)(X) = f[X,Y] - [fX,Y]</math>
<math>\! (Yf)(X) = f[X,Y] - [fX,Y]</math>


which is exactly what the corollary of Leibniz rule above states.
which is exactly what the corollary of Leibniz rule above states.

Revision as of 01:18, 24 July 2009

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, that a map constructed in a certain way is tensorial
View other such statements

Statement

Symbolic statement

Let M be a differential manifold and ∇ be a linear connection on M (viz., ∇ is a connection on the tangent bundle TM of M).

Consider the torsion of ∇, namely:

τ(∇):Γ(TM)×Γ(TM)→Γ(TM)

given by:

τ(∇)(X,Y)=∇XY−∇YX−[X,Y]

Then, τ(∇) is a tensorial map in both coordinates.

Facts used

X(fg)=(Xf)(g)+f(Xg)

f[X,Y]=[fX,Y]+(Yf)X

f[X,Y]=[X,fY]−(Xf)Y

  • The Leibniz rule axiom that's part of the definition of a connection, namely:

∇X(fZ)=(Xf)(Z)+f∇X(Z)

Proof

Tensoriality in the first coordinate

We'll use the fact that tensoriality is equivalent to C∞-linearity.

To prove: τ(∇)(fX,Y)=fτ(∇)(X,Y)

Proof: We prove this by expanding everything out on the left side:

τ(∇)(fX,Y)=∇fX(Y)−∇Y(fX)−[fX,Y]=f∇XY−f∇YX−(Yf)(X)−[fX,Y]

To prove the equality with fτ(∇)(X,Y), we observe that it reduces to showing:

(Yf)(X)=f[X,Y]−[fX,Y]

which is exactly what the corollary of Leibniz rule above states.

Tensoriality in the second coordinate

The proof is analogous to that for the first coordinate.

To prove τ(∇)(X,fY)=fτ(∇)(X,Y)

Proof: We prove this by expanding everything out on the left side:

τ(∇)(X,fY)=∇X(fY)=∇fY(X)−[X,fY]=(Xf)(Y)+f∇XY−f∇YX−f[X,Y]−(Xf)Y

(the last step uses the corollary of Leibniz rule).

Canceling terms, yields the required result.