Torsion is tensorial: Difference between revisions

From Diffgeom
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
===Symbolic statement===
===Symbolic statement===


Let <math>M</math> be a [[differential manifold]] and <math>\nabla</math> be a [[linear connection]] on <math>M</math> (viz., <math>\nabla</math> is a [[connection]] on the [[tangent bundle]] <math>TM</math> of <math>M</math>).
Let <math>M</math> be a [[differential manifold]] and <math>\nabla</math> be a [[fact about::linear connection]] on <math>M</math> (viz., <math>\nabla</math> is a [[connection]] on the [[tangent bundle]] <math>TM</math> of <math>M</math>).


Consider the [[torsion of a linear connection|torsion]] of <math>\nabla</math>, namely:
Consider the [[fact about::torsion of a linear connection|torsion]] of <math>\nabla</math>, namely:


<math>\tau(\nabla): \Gamma(TM) \times \Gamma(TM) \to \Gamma(TM)</math>
<math>\tau(\nabla): \Gamma(TM) \times \Gamma(TM) \to \Gamma(TM)</math>
Line 14: Line 14:
<math>\tau(\nabla)(X,Y) = \nabla_X Y - \nabla_Y X - [X,Y]</math>
<math>\tau(\nabla)(X,Y) = \nabla_X Y - \nabla_Y X - [X,Y]</math>


Then, <math>\tau(\nabla)</math> is a [[tensorial map]] in both coordinates.
Then, <math>\tau(\nabla)</math> is a [[fact about::tensorial map]] in both coordinates.


==Facts used==
==Facts used==

Revision as of 01:19, 24 July 2009

This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, that a map constructed in a certain way is tensorial
View other such statements

Statement

Symbolic statement

Let M be a differential manifold and be a linear connection on M (viz., is a connection on the tangent bundle TM of M).

Consider the torsion of , namely:

τ():Γ(TM)×Γ(TM)Γ(TM)

given by:

τ()(X,Y)=XYYX[X,Y]

Then, τ() is a tensorial map in both coordinates.

Facts used

X(fg)=(Xf)(g)+f(Xg)

f[X,Y]=[fX,Y]+(Yf)X

f[X,Y]=[X,fY](Xf)Y

  • The Leibniz rule axiom that's part of the definition of a connection, namely:

X(fZ)=(Xf)(Z)+fX(Z)

Proof

Tensoriality in the first coordinate

We'll use the fact that tensoriality is equivalent to C-linearity.

To prove: τ()(fX,Y)=fτ()(X,Y)

Proof: We prove this by expanding everything out on the left side:

τ()(fX,Y)=fX(Y)Y(fX)[fX,Y]=fXYfYX(Yf)(X)[fX,Y]

To prove the equality with fτ()(X,Y), we observe that it reduces to showing:

(Yf)(X)=f[X,Y][fX,Y]

which is exactly what the corollary of Leibniz rule above states.

Tensoriality in the second coordinate

The proof is analogous to that for the first coordinate.

To prove τ()(X,fY)=fτ()(X,Y)

Proof: We prove this by expanding everything out on the left side:

τ()(X,fY)=X(fY)=fY(X)[X,fY]=(Xf)(Y)+fXYfYXf[X,Y](Xf)Y

(the last step uses the corollary of Leibniz rule).

Canceling terms, yields the required result.