Torsion is tensorial: Difference between revisions
(→Proof) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
===Symbolic statement=== | ===Symbolic statement=== | ||
Let <math>M</math> be a [[differential manifold]] and <math>\nabla</math> be a [[linear connection]] on <math>M</math> (viz., <math>\nabla</math> is a [[connection]] on the [[tangent bundle]] <math>TM</math> of <math>M</math>). | Let <math>M</math> be a [[differential manifold]] and <math>\nabla</math> be a [[fact about::linear connection]] on <math>M</math> (viz., <math>\nabla</math> is a [[connection]] on the [[tangent bundle]] <math>TM</math> of <math>M</math>). | ||
Consider the [[torsion of a linear connection|torsion]] of <math>\nabla</math>, namely: | Consider the [[fact about::torsion of a linear connection|torsion]] of <math>\nabla</math>, namely: | ||
<math>\tau(\nabla): \Gamma(TM) \times \Gamma(TM) \to \Gamma(TM)</math> | <math>\tau(\nabla): \Gamma(TM) \times \Gamma(TM) \to \Gamma(TM)</math> | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
<math>\tau(\nabla)(X,Y) = \nabla_X Y - \nabla_Y X - [X,Y]</math> | <math>\tau(\nabla)(X,Y) = \nabla_X Y - \nabla_Y X - [X,Y]</math> | ||
Then, <math>\tau(\nabla)</math> is a [[tensorial map]] in both coordinates. | Then, <math>\tau(\nabla)</math> is a [[fact about::tensorial map]] in both coordinates. | ||
==Facts used== | ==Facts used== | ||
Revision as of 01:19, 24 July 2009
This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, that a map constructed in a certain way is tensorial
View other such statements
Statement
Symbolic statement
Let be a differential manifold and be a linear connection on (viz., is a connection on the tangent bundle of ).
Consider the torsion of , namely:
given by:
Then, is a tensorial map in both coordinates.
Facts used
- Leibniz rule for derivations: This states that for a vector field and functions , we have:
- Corollary of Leibniz rule for Lie bracket: This states that for a function and vector fields :
- The Leibniz rule axiom that's part of the definition of a connection, namely:
Proof
Tensoriality in the first coordinate
We'll use the fact that tensoriality is equivalent to -linearity.
To prove:
Proof: We prove this by expanding everything out on the left side:
To prove the equality with , we observe that it reduces to showing:
which is exactly what the corollary of Leibniz rule above states.
Tensoriality in the second coordinate
The proof is analogous to that for the first coordinate.
To prove
Proof: We prove this by expanding everything out on the left side:
(the last step uses the corollary of Leibniz rule).
Canceling terms, yields the required result.