Connection is module structure over connection algebra: Difference between revisions

From Diffgeom
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Statement==
==Statement==


Let <math>E</math> be a [[vector bundle]] over a [[differential manifold]] <math>M</math>. Then, a [[connection]] on <math>E</math> is equivalent to giving <math>\mathcal{E}</math> (the [[sheaf of sections of a vector bundle|sheaf of sections]] of <math>E</math>) the structure of a module over the [[connection algebra]] over <math>M</math>.
Let <math>E</math> be a [[vector bundle]] over a [[differential manifold]] <math>M</math>. Then, a [[connection]] on <math>E</math> is equivalent to giving <math>\Gamma(E)</math> (the vector space of sections of <math>E</math>) the structure of a module over the [[connection algebra]] of <math>M</math>. Equivalently, it gives <math>\mathcal{E}</math> (the [[sheaf of sections of a vector bundle|sheaf of sections]] of <math>E</math>) the structure of a module over the [[sheaf of connection algebras]] over <math>M</math>.


==Definitions used==
==Definitions used==

Revision as of 20:43, 6 April 2008

Statement

Let be a vector bundle over a differential manifold . Then, a connection on is equivalent to giving (the vector space of sections of ) the structure of a module over the connection algebra of . Equivalently, it gives (the sheaf of sections of ) the structure of a module over the sheaf of connection algebras over .

Definitions used

Connection

Further information: Connection

Connection algebra

Further information: Connection algebra

Proof

We start with a connection on and show how naturally equips with the structure of a module over .

Let denote the Lie algebra of first-order differential operators of . For now, we're thinking of as a -bimodule. Let be the algebra of all smooth fiber-preserving linear maps from to .

A connection gives a map:

as follows:

First observe that the map sends to , and is the identity restricted to that subset. In other words, the differential operator of multiplication by a function , goes to the operator of multiplication by the function .

We now argue that the map is in fact a -bimodule map. The fact that it is a left -module map follows from the fact that:

while the fact that it is a right -module map follows from the Leibniz rule.

The upshot is that the induced map:

is a -bimodule map, and hence extends to a -linear homomorphism from the tensor algebra of over to . Clearly, acts trivially, so we obtain a homomorphism:

giving the structure of a module over the algebra .

References

Textbook references