Hopf-Rinow theorem: Difference between revisions

From Diffgeom
(Started the page)
 
Line 18: Line 18:
The upshot of this is: given <math>p \in M</math>, there is an <math>\epsilon</math> such that the set of points at distance <math>\epsilon</math> from <math>p</math> is a compact set, and such that there is a unique minimizing geodesic from <math>p</math> to each of them
The upshot of this is: given <math>p \in M</math>, there is an <math>\epsilon</math> such that the set of points at distance <math>\epsilon</math> from <math>p</math> is a compact set, and such that there is a unique minimizing geodesic from <math>p</math> to each of them


* Any geodesic can be extended indefinitely in both directions (this follows from the assumption that our manifold is geodesically complete)
* Any geodesic can be extended indefinitely (and uniquely) in both directions (this follows from the assumption that our manifold is geodesically complete)


The proof beyond these two facts is purely geometric (that is, it only uses standard properties of metrics and continuous maps).
The proof beyond these two facts is purely geometric (that is, it only uses standard properties of metrics and continuous maps).

Revision as of 00:11, 6 April 2007

Statement

Let be a Riemannian manifold (viz is a differential manifold equipped with a Riemannian metric ). Then, the Hopf-Rinow theorem states that the following are equivalent:

  • is geodesically complete, viz any geodesic can be extended indefinitely in both directions
  • is complete as a metric space (with metric induced by the Riemannian distance function)

In some texts, the Hopf-Rinow theorem is expressed in another form (which is more geometric):

If is geodesically complete, then given any two points there is a minimizing geodesic joining and .

Proof

The geometric version of Hopf-Rinow theorem (from which the other version easily falls out) can be proved by applying triangle inequalities once we have established the following basic facts:

  • Given , there exists , such that the exponential map takes the unit sphere of radius about to the set of points on the manifold at distance from , with the minimal geodesics from being exponentials of the radial paths.

The upshot of this is: given , there is an such that the set of points at distance from is a compact set, and such that there is a unique minimizing geodesic from to each of them

  • Any geodesic can be extended indefinitely (and uniquely) in both directions (this follows from the assumption that our manifold is geodesically complete)

The proof beyond these two facts is purely geometric (that is, it only uses standard properties of metrics and continuous maps).