Levi-Civita connection: Difference between revisions

From Diffgeom
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
===Given data===
===Given data===


A [[Riemmanian manifold]] <math>(M,g)</math> (here, <math>M</math> is a [[differential manifold]] and <math>g</math> is the additional structure of a [[Riemannian metric]] on it).
A [[Riemannian manifold]] <math>(M,g)</math> (here, <math>M</math> is a [[differential manifold]] and <math>g</math> is the additional structure of a [[Riemannian metric]] on it).


More generally, we can also look at a [[pseudo-Riemannian manifold]], or a manifold with a smoothly varying nondegenerate (not necessarily positive definite) symmetric positive definite bilinear form in each tangent space.
More generally, we can also look at a [[pseudo-Riemannian manifold]], or a manifold with a smoothly varying nondegenerate (not necessarily positive definite) symmetric positive definite bilinear form in each tangent space.

Revision as of 12:28, 30 August 2007

This lives as an element of: the space of all linear connections, which in turn sits inside the space of all

R

-bilinear maps

Γ(TM)×Γ(TM)→Γ(TM)

Definition

Given data

A Riemannian manifold (M,g) (here, M is a differential manifold and g is the additional structure of a Riemannian metric on it).

More generally, we can also look at a pseudo-Riemannian manifold, or a manifold with a smoothly varying nondegenerate (not necessarily positive definite) symmetric positive definite bilinear form in each tangent space.

Definition part

A Levi-Civita connection on (M,g) is a linear connection ∇ on M satisfying the following two conditions:

  • The connection is metric, viz Xg(Y,Z)=g(∇XY,Z)+g(Y,∇XZ)
  • The connection is torsion-free, viz ∇XY−∇YX=[X,Y]

Facts

The Levi-Civita connection is unique

The proof of the uniqueness of the Levi-Civita connection is as follows.

  • Take three vector fields X,Y,Z. Now, consider the three equations obtained by cycling X,Y,Z in the first condition. Solving this system of linear equations, we can express g(∇XY,Z) in terms of X,Y,Z.

Explicitly:

g(∇XY,Z)+g(Y,∇XZ)=Xg(Y,Z)

g(∇YX,Z)+g(X,∇YZ)=Yg(Z,X)

g(∇ZX,Y)+g(X,∇ZY)=Zg(X,Y)

Now let's choose to focus only on the clockwise cyclic expressions, that is, the three expressions p=g(∇XY,Z),q=g(∇YZ,X),q=g(∇ZX,Y).

Writing everything in terms of these three (we here make use of the torsion tensor vanishing):

p+q=Xg(Y,Z)−g(Y,[X,Z])

and similarly for the other three variables.

We thus get expressions for g(∇XY,Z) in terms of g and the Lie bracket.

  • Now use the fact that g is nondegenerate to conclude that knowledge of the function g(∇XY,Z) for all Z helps us fix ∇XY uniquely.
  • This means that we have a unique definition for ∇.

Note that the nondegeneracy of g is very important, otherwise knowing the value of the inner product for any three vectors may not necessarily help us in computing the value of nablaXY

To show that the Levi-Civita connection exists, it suffices to check that the map sending Z to what we propose for g(∇XY,Z) is actually a linear map.

Christoffel symbols

The Levi-Civita connection on a manifold M is a map ∇:Γ(TM)×Γ(TM)→Γ(TM). This means that at any point p∈M, it gives a map Tp(M)×Tp(M)→Tp(M), which roughly differentiates one tangent vector along another.

Let ∂1,∂2,…,∂n form a basis for the tangent space TM. Then, the Christoffel symbol Γijk is the component along ek of the vector ∇∂i∂j.

The Christoffel symbols thus give an explicit description of the Levi-Civita connection. Namely, the Levi-Civita connection can be expressed using the Christoffel symbols.