This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, that a map constructed in a certain way is tensorial
View other such statements
Statement
Let 
 be a connection on a vector bundle 
 over a differential manifold 
. The Riemann curvature tensor of 
 is given as a map 
 defined by:
We claim that 
 is a tensorial map in each of the variables 
.
Related facts
Facts used
| Fact no. | 
Name | 
Full statement
 | 
| 1 | 
Leibniz rule for derivations | 
For a vector field   and functions  , we have:  
 | 
| 2 | 
Corollary of Leibniz rule for Lie bracket | 
For a function   and vector fields  :
 ![{\displaystyle \!f[X,Y]=[fX,Y]+(Yf)X}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/5c70e73372d3de476cbaa79feca611dcbf63f66d) 
  
 
 | 
| 3 | 
The Leibniz-like axiom that is part of the definition of a connection | 
For a function   and vector fields  , and a connection  , we have  
 | 
Proof
To prove tensoriality in a variable, it suffices to show 
-linearity in that variable. This is because linearity in 
-functions guarantees linearity in a function that is 1 at exactly one point, and zero at others.
The proofs for 
 and 
 are analogous, and rely on manipulation of the Lie bracket 
 and the property of a connection being 
 in the subscript vector. These proofs do not involve any explicit use of 
. The proof for 
 relies simply on repeated application of the product rule, and the fact that 
.
Tensoriality in the first variable
Given: 
 is a 
-function.
To prove: 
, or more explicitly, 
We start out with the left side:
Each step below is obtained from the previous one via some manipulation explained along side.
| Step no. | 
Current status of left side | 
Facts/properties used | 
Specific rewrites
 | 
| 1 | 
![{\displaystyle f\nabla _{X}\nabla _{Y}-\nabla _{Y}(f\nabla _{X})-\nabla _{[fX,Y]}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/24c161bb16508cef218c7ce323a77f6f09e2d835)  | 
By definition of a connection,   is  -linear in its subscript argument. | 
 
 | 
| 2 | 
![{\displaystyle f\nabla _{X}\nabla _{Y}-(Yf)\nabla _{X}-f\nabla _{Y}\nabla _{X}-\nabla _{[fX,Y]}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/844410b698a59273250425676efcb0c29ed9ff3d)  | 
Fact (3), the Leibniz-like axiom for connection. | 
 . To understand this more clearly imagine an input   to the whole expression, so that the rewrite becomes  . In the notation of fact (3),  ,  , and  .
 | 
| 3 | 
![{\displaystyle f(\nabla _{X}\nabla _{Y}-\nabla _{Y}\nabla _{X})-\nabla _{(Yf)X}-\nabla _{[fX,Y]}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/fd9e1e7294b88d5859ca975cf216cf58f0dec1bb)  | 
  is  -linear in its subscript argument | 
 
 | 
| 4 | 
![{\displaystyle f(\nabla _{X}\nabla _{Y}-\nabla _{Y}\nabla _{X})-\nabla _{(Yf)X+[fX,Y]}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/1e19c6d1389a9918b61100329f2f8449cbc2a1fd)  | 
  is additive in its subscript argument | 
Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle \nabla_{(Yf)}X} + \nabla_{[fX,Y]} = \nabla_{(Yf)X + [fX,Y]}}
 | 
| 5 | 
![{\displaystyle f(\nabla _{X}\nabla _{Y}-\nabla _{Y}\nabla _{X}-\nabla _{[X,Y]})}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/8adfa3b6ed85e7f41d546b4ced555abaa1af8811)  | 
Fact (2) | 
 .
 | 
Tensoriality in the second variable
Given: 
 is a 
-function.
To prove: 
, or more explicitly, 
.
We start out with the left side:
Each step below is obtained from the previous one via some manipulation explained along side.
| Step no. | 
Current status of left side | 
Facts/properties used | 
Specific rewrites
 | 
| 1 | 
![{\displaystyle \nabla _{X}(f\nabla _{Y})-f\nabla _{Y}\nabla _{X}-\nabla _{[X,fY]}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/82c74a667ff2b14125b26587befc0df6ed64be65)  | 
By definition of a connection,   is  -linear in its subscript argument | 
 .
 | 
| 2 | 
![{\displaystyle (Xf)\nabla _{Y}+f(\nabla _{X}\nabla _{Y})-f\nabla _{Y}\nabla _{X}-\nabla _{[X,fY]}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/4fe6fc708287f702eeae47ed87a5bc61ec75eca8)  | 
Fact (3), the Leibniz-like axiom for connection | 
 . To make this more concrete, imagine an input  . Then, the rewrite becomes  . This comes setting  ,  ,   in Fact (3).
 | 
| 3 | 
![{\displaystyle f(\nabla _{X}\nabla _{Y}-\nabla _{Y}\nabla _{X})-\nabla _{[X,fY]}+\nabla _{(Xf)Y}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/b34a71786e59b3b00bbf0ca75ba46a01c8fa63fb)  | 
  is  -linear in its subscript argument. | 
 
 | 
| 4 | 
![{\displaystyle f(\nabla _{X}\nabla _{Y}-\nabla _{Y}\nabla _{X})-\nabla _{[X,fY]-(Xf)Y}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/2a9fcafe3184451ff871d6bfaace7e20c4d87192)  | 
  is additive in its subscript argument. | 
 .
 | 
| 5 | 
![{\displaystyle f(\nabla _{X}\nabla _{Y}-\nabla _{Y}\nabla _{X}-\nabla _{[X,Y]}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/b96e045dee68e9f88c205a156dba5bac94c4c6a4)  | 
Fact (2) | 
 
 | 
Tensoriality in the third variable
Let 
 be a scalar function. We will show that:
We start out with the left side:
Now we apply the Leibniz rule for connnections on each term:
We again apply the Leibniz rule to the first two term groups:
After cancellations we are left with the following six terms:
But since 
, the last three terms vanish, and we are left with: