This article gives the statement, and possibly proof, that a map constructed in a certain way is tensorial
View other such statements
Statement
Let
be a connection on a vector bundle
over a differential manifold
. The Riemann curvature tensor of
is given as a map
defined by:
We claim that
is a tensorial map in each of the variables
.
Related facts
Facts used
Fact no. |
Name |
Full statement
|
1 |
Leibniz rule for derivations |
For a vector field and functions , we have:
|
2 |
Corollary of Leibniz rule for Lie bracket |
For a function and vector fields :
![{\displaystyle \!f[X,Y]=[fX,Y]+(Yf)X}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/5c70e73372d3de476cbaa79feca611dcbf63f66d)
|
3 |
The Leibniz-like axiom that is part of the definition of a connection |
For a function and vector fields , and a connection , we have
|
Proof
To prove tensoriality in a variable, it suffices to show
-linearity in that variable. This is because linearity in
-functions guarantees linearity in a function that is 1 at exactly one point, and zero at others.
The proofs for
and
are analogous, and rely on manipulation of the Lie bracket
and the property of a connection being
in the subscript vector. These proofs do not involve any explicit use of
. The proof for
relies simply on repeated application of the product rule, and the fact that
.
Tensoriality in the first variable
Given:
is a
-function.
To prove:
, or more explicitly,
We start out with the left side:
Each step below is obtained from the previous one via some manipulation explained along side.
Step no. |
Current status of left side |
Facts/properties used |
Specific rewrites
|
1 |
![{\displaystyle f\nabla _{X}\nabla _{Y}-\nabla _{Y}(f\nabla _{X})-\nabla _{[fX,Y]}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/24c161bb16508cef218c7ce323a77f6f09e2d835) |
By definition of a connection, is -linear in its subscript argument. |
|
2 |
![{\displaystyle f\nabla _{X}\nabla _{Y}-(Yf)\nabla _{X}-f\nabla _{Y}\nabla _{X}-\nabla _{[fX,Y]}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/844410b698a59273250425676efcb0c29ed9ff3d) |
Fact (3), the Leibniz-like axiom for connection. |
. To understand this more clearly imagine an input to the whole expression, so that the rewrite becomes . In the notation of fact (3), , , and .
|
3 |
![{\displaystyle f(\nabla _{X}\nabla _{Y}-\nabla _{Y}\nabla _{X})-\nabla _{(Yf)X}-\nabla _{[fX,Y]}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/fd9e1e7294b88d5859ca975cf216cf58f0dec1bb) |
is -linear in its subscript argument |
|
4 |
![{\displaystyle f(\nabla _{X}\nabla _{Y}-\nabla _{Y}\nabla _{X})-\nabla _{(Yf)X+[fX,Y]}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/1e19c6d1389a9918b61100329f2f8449cbc2a1fd) |
is additive in its subscript argument |
Failed to parse (syntax error): {\displaystyle \nabla_{(Yf)}X} + \nabla_{[fX,Y]} = \nabla_{(Yf)X + [fX,Y]}}
|
5 |
![{\displaystyle f(\nabla _{X}\nabla _{Y}-\nabla _{Y}\nabla _{X}-\nabla _{[X,Y]})}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/8adfa3b6ed85e7f41d546b4ced555abaa1af8811) |
Fact (2) |
.
|
Tensoriality in the second variable
Given:
is a
-function.
To prove:
, or more explicitly,
.
We start out with the left side:
Each step below is obtained from the previous one via some manipulation explained along side.
Step no. |
Current status of left side |
Facts/properties used |
Specific rewrites
|
1 |
![{\displaystyle \nabla _{X}(f\nabla _{Y})-f\nabla _{Y}\nabla _{X}-\nabla _{[X,fY]}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/82c74a667ff2b14125b26587befc0df6ed64be65) |
By definition of a connection, is -linear in its subscript argument |
.
|
2 |
![{\displaystyle (Xf)\nabla _{Y}+f(\nabla _{X}\nabla _{Y})-f\nabla _{Y}\nabla _{X}-\nabla _{[X,fY]}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/4fe6fc708287f702eeae47ed87a5bc61ec75eca8) |
Fact (3), the Leibniz-like axiom for connection |
. To make this more concrete, imagine an input . Then, the rewrite becomes . This comes setting , , in Fact (3).
|
3 |
![{\displaystyle f(\nabla _{X}\nabla _{Y}-\nabla _{Y}\nabla _{X})-\nabla _{[X,fY]}+\nabla _{(Xf)Y}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/b34a71786e59b3b00bbf0ca75ba46a01c8fa63fb) |
is -linear in its subscript argument. |
|
4 |
![{\displaystyle f(\nabla _{X}\nabla _{Y}-\nabla _{Y}\nabla _{X})-\nabla _{[X,fY]-(Xf)Y}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/2a9fcafe3184451ff871d6bfaace7e20c4d87192) |
is additive in its subscript argument. |
.
|
5 |
![{\displaystyle f(\nabla _{X}\nabla _{Y}-\nabla _{Y}\nabla _{X}-\nabla _{[X,Y]}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/b96e045dee68e9f88c205a156dba5bac94c4c6a4) |
Fact (2) |
|
Tensoriality in the third variable
Let
be a scalar function. We will show that:
We start out with the left side:
Now we apply the Leibniz rule for connnections on each term:
We again apply the Leibniz rule to the first two term groups:
After cancellations we are left with the following six terms:
But since
, the last three terms vanish, and we are left with: